Ryan Peniston vs Chris Rodesch Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In recent months, Rodesch has demonstrated a superior ability to win points on their second serve, achieving a success rate of 45.67%, compared to Peniston's 41.5%. This statistic is often a significant indicator of match outcomes. Additionally, Rodesch has outperformed Peniston in saving breakpoints, with a save percentage of 55.83% versus 48.69%, providing valuable insights for in-game betting predictions.

Analyzing return game stats, Rodesch has secured 45.18% of points when returning an opponent's second serve, whereas Peniston stands at 43.88%. However, Peniston has a slight edge in first serve returns with a success rate of 29.55% compared to Rodesch's 25.93%. These statistics can heavily influence predictions regarding who might be favored in head-to-head matchups.

Assessing surface proficiency, both players exhibit their strongest performance on Hard courts. Rodesch boasts an impressive 84% win rate on this surface, while Peniston follows with a 66% win rate. Conversely, Rodesch's performance on Indoor Hard courts drops to 53%, whereas Peniston struggles on Grass with a winning percentage of 52%.

In terms of match play, Rodesch has shown a robust overall performance, triumphing in 78.95% of his matches over the past year (W/L 60/16). Peniston's record is slightly less impressive, with a 65.22% win rate (W/L 45/24). This gives Rodesch a stronger general head-to-head prediction overview.

Considering event-level play, Rodesch and Peniston have largely competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, with Rodesch achieving a higher win percentage of 91.3% (W/L 42/4) against Peniston's 82.5% (W/L 33/7). Player level and opponent ranking—averaging 410.54 for Rodesch and 405.16 for Peniston—provide further context to their competitive environment.

Rodesch's prowess in deciding sets is noteworthy, securing victories in 82% of such scenarios over the past year, significantly higher than Peniston's 55%. This marker is crucial for live predictions and betting scenarios.

Lastly, when examining break point conversion, Peniston demonstrates a higher efficacy, converting 37.93% of their opportunities, surpassing Rodesch's 28.04%. This aspect is vital for in-game live betting strategies, especially during breakpoint opportunities.

Taking into account these statistics, Rodesch appears to have a slight advantage going into the match, making him the likely frontrunner in this upcoming encounter.